|
One of the hallmarks of our law firm
is that we utilize both print and web-based
legal research software to keep us up-to-date
on the latest developments in business,
entertainment and Internet law. The
following are examples of some of the
key laws that have been passed by the
States of New York and New Jersey and
by the Federal Government in 2007 that
were significant to these practice areas.
Environmental Law – NJ
The "Industrial Site Recovery
Act," NJSA13:1K-6 et al., was amended
as of January 11, 2007 to include requirements
that the local municipality be advised
when a landowner makes a filing with
the Department of Environmental Protection
under that statute.
The owner or operator of the industrial
establishment shall also provide all
information required to be submitted
to the department pursuant to this subsection
to the clerk of the municipality in
which the industrial establishment is
located, at the same time the information
to the department.
The law relating to the closure and
remediation of underground storage tanks
was modified through NJSA 58:10A-37.6
which was approved on January 24, 2007.
A change in the filing date
resulting from failure to submit a
completed application or from failure
to submit the application fee in a
timely fashion for applications filed
for financial assistance for a regulated
tank to meet the upgrade or closure
requirements pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
s.6991 et seq. or P.L.1986, c. 102
(C.58:10A-21 et seq.) or for the remediation
of a discharge from any such regulated
tank shall not render the application
ineligible for financial assistance
as long as the initial date of application
is prior to June 30, 2010 or for a
regulated tank that is not operational,
18 months from the date of discovery
of the tank or June 30, 2010, whichever
is later.
Intellectual Property –
Identity Theft; Trademarks - NJ
On January 29, 2007, an Act was passed
prohibiting identity theft discrimination
by creditors. NJSA 2C:21-1, section
1 of P.L.1983, c. 565, NJSA 2C:21-2.1
or NJSA 2C:21-17. It stated that a "creditor
shall not deny credit to, or reduce
the credit limit of, an individual solely
because that individual was a victim
of identity theft pursuant to NJSA 56:11-51."
On March 15, 2007, a law was passed
prohibiting a person or entity from
using a trade name or trademark of a
depository institution in a manner that
would give the impression that they
were affiliated with that institution.
NJSA 17:16Y-1.
1. No person shall use or reference
the trade name or trademark of a depository
institution, its affiliate or subsidiary
or a trade name or trademark similar
to that of a depository institution,
its affiliate or subsidiary in any
solicitation for services or products
without the consent of the depository
institution, affiliate or subsidiary.
2. No person shall use or reference
a consumer's loan number, loan amount
or other specific loan information,
whether publicly available or not,
in any solicitation for services or
products without the consent of the
depository institution, affiliate
or subsidiary.
3. No person shall use the trade
name or trademark of a depository
institution, its affiliate or subsidiary
or a trade name or trademark similar
to that of a depository institution,
its affiliate or subsidiary in any
advertisement or solicitation for
services or products when that use
could cause any reasonable person
to be confused, mistaken or deceived,
initially or otherwise, as to the
sponsorship, affiliation, connection
or association of that person using
the trade name or trademark with the
depository institution, affiliate
or subsidiary or as to the approval
of that person using the trade name
or trademark by the depository institution,
affiliate or subsidiary.
Construction Law - NJ
On April 26, 2007, a law was passed
penalizing contractors on public contracting
jobs who do not pay prevailing wages.
NJSA 34:11-56.38.
The public body awarding any
contract for public work, or otherwise
undertaking any public work, or entering
into a lease or agreement to lease
pursuant to which public work is to
be done, shall first ascertain from
the commissioner the list of names
of contractors or subcontractors who
have failed to pay prevailing wages
as determined in section 13 of this
act , and no contract shall be awarded
to such contractor or subcontractor,
or to any firm, corporation or partnership
in which such contractor or subcontractor
has an interest until three years
have elapsed from the date of listing
as determined in section 13 of this
act .
Entertainment Law - NJ
On May 4, 2007, a law was passed concerning
certain deceptive practices in the advertising
or conducting of certain musical performances
NJSA 2A:32B-1.
A person shall not advertise or conduct
a live musical performance or production
through the use of an affiliation, connection
or association between the performing
group and the recording group unless:
a. The performing group is the
authorized registrant and owner of
a federal service mark for the group
registered in the United States Patent
and Trademark Office; or
b. At least one member of the
performing group was a member of the
recording group and has a legal right
by virtue or use of operation under
the group name without having abandoned
the name of affiliation of the group;
or
c. The live musical performance
or production is identified in all
advertising and promotion as a salute
or tribute; or
d. The advertising does not
relate to a live musical performance
or production taking place in this
State; or
e. The performance or production
is expressly authorized by the recording
group.
Telephone Records Fraud - US
On January 12, 2007, the United States
Congress passed a law called the "Telephone
Records and Privacy Protection Act of
2006." ThisAct is intended to strengthen
protections for law enforcement officers
and the public by providing criminal
penalties for the fraudulent use of
the telephone system. 18 USCA §
1038.
1038. Congress finds that—
(1) telephone records can be
of great use to criminals because
the information contained in call
logs may include a wealth of personal
data;
(2) call logs may reveal the
names of telephone users' doctors,
public and private relationships,
business associates, and more;
(3) call logs are typically
maintained for the exclusive use of
phone companies, their authorized
agents, and authorized consumers;
(4) telephone records have been
obtained without the knowledge or
consent of consumers through the use
of a number of fraudulent methods
and devices that include—
(A) telephone company employees
selling data to unauthorized data
brokers;
(B) "pretexting",
whereby a data broker or other person
represents that they are an authorized
consumer and convinces an agent of
the telephone company to release the
data; or
(C) gaining unauthorized Internet
access to account data by improperly
activating a consumer's account management
features on a phone company's webpage
or contracting with an Internet-based
data broker who trafficks in such
records; and
(5) the unauthorized disclosure
of telephone records not only assaults
individual privacy but, in some instances,
may further acts of domestic violence
or stalking, compromise the personal
safety of law enforcement officers,
their families, victims of crime,
witnesses, or confidential informants,
and undermine the integrity of law
enforcement investigations.
1039. Fraud and related activity
in connection with obtaining confidential
phone records information of a covered
entity
(a) CRIMINAL VIOLATION.--Whoever,
in interstate or foreign commerce,
knowingly and intentionally obtains,
or attempts to obtain, confidential
phone records information of a covered
entity, by —
(1) making false or fraudulent
statements or representations to an
employee of a covered entity;
(2) making such false or fraudulent
statements or representations to a
customer of a covered entity;
(3) providing a document to
a covered entity knowing that such
document is false or fraudulent; or
(4) accessing customer accounts
of a covered entity via the Internet,
or by means of conduct that violates
section 1030 of this title, without
prior authorization from the customer
to whom such confidential phone records
information relates; shall be fined
under this title, imprisoned for not
more than 10 years, or both.
Mail Order Guidelines - NY
On June 4, 2007, the New York General
Business law § 396-m was amended
to put in place guidelines relating
to mail-order and telephone-order merchandise.
The guidelines now specifically include
email and Internet orders. The following
modifications have been made:
a. "mail-order business"
shall mean a business which is engaged
in the solicitation of orders by advertisement
or otherwise for merchandise or services
connected with merchandise to be shipped
to the customer through the mail or
by other carrier, upon receipt of
an order with payment or with charge
account authorization remitted through
the mail, electronic mail or the Internet
or by telephone and the merchandise
by its nature is ready for use or
consumption when advertised or offered
for sale and can be held in stock.
e. "accepts orders"
shall mean, in the case of a mail
order, receipt of an order with payment
or with charge account authorization
remitted through the mail, electronic
mail or the Internet, and, in the
case of a telephone order, receipt
of an order with charge account authorization
and debiting the buyer's account.
b. accept orders for merchandise
which is not reasonably anticipated
to be available for shipment within
thirty days from the date of receipt
of the order together with payment
or with charge account authorization
in the case of an order remitted through
the mail, electronic mail or the Internet
or within thirty days from the date
the seller debits the buyer's account
in the case of an order placed by
telephone.
Ethics in Government - NY
On January 1, 2007, New York Governor
Spitzer issued Executive Order No. 1
which provided for the establishment
of ethical conduct guidelines in State
government. Those guidelines include
the following provisions:
Prohibition Against the Receipt
of Gifts
Subject to the conditions set forth
below, all individuals covered by
this executive order are prohibited
from accepting gifts or gratuities
of more than normal value where the
circumstances would permit the inference
that: (a) the gift was intended to
influence the individual in the performance
of official business; or (b) the gift
constituted a tip, reward, or sign
of appreciation for any official act
by the employee. This prohibition
shall apply notwithstanding Public
Officers Law § 73(5), which provides
that gifts up to $75 may be allowed
in certain circumstances.
Prohibition Against the Use
of State Property
State supplies, equipment, computers,
personnel and other resources may
not be utilized for non-governmental
purposes, including for personal purposes
or for outside activities of any kind.
This prohibition includes but is not
limited to the following:
a. Official stationery may not
be used for non-governmental purposes,
nor may State government resources
be used to mail personal correspondence.
The designation "personal"
on agency stationery means only that
the contents are meant for the personal
viewing of the addressee and not that
the sender is acting unofficially.
All letters and other written materials
printed on such official stationery
are considered official, and thus
the designation "unofficial"
has no meaning and may not be used.
b. Under no circumstances may
State mail, postage, internal office
mail, or inter-city couriers be used
for non-governmental purposes.
c. State telephones may not
be used for non-governmental long-distance
calls, except for toll-free calls,
collect calls, and calls billed to
a personal telephone number. State
telephones may be used for incidental
and necessary personal local calls
that are of limited number and duration
and do not conflict with the proper
exercise of the duties of the State
employee.
d. State computers may be used
for incidental and necessary personal
purposes, such as sending personal
electronic mail messages, provided
that such use is in a limited amount
and duration and does not conflict
with the proper exercise of the duties
of the State employee.
e. State vehicles shall be used
for official business or incidental
use associated with official business
away from an employee's official work
station. Individuals who are authorized
by their agency or public authority
to use a vehicle for personal purposes
shall keep records of such use, and
the value of such personal use shall
be calculated and reported as personal
income to such individual for tax
purposes.
Prohibition Against Nepotism
in Hiring and Contracting
a. No individual covered by
this order may take part in any hiring
or employment decision relating to
a family member. If a hiring or employment
matter arises relating to a family
member, then the employee must advise
his or her supervisor of the relationship,
and must be recused from any and all
discussions or decisions relating
to the matter.
b. No individual covered by
this order may take part in any contracting
decision: (i) relating to a family
member; or (ii) relating to any entity
in which a family member is an officer,
director or partner, or in which a
family member owns or controls 10%
or more of the stock of such entity.
If a contracting matter arises relating
to a family member, then the employee
must advise his or her supervisor
of the relationship, and must be recused
from any and all discussions or decisions
relating to the matter.
c. For the purposes of this
paragraph, the term "family member"
shall mean any person living in the
same household as the employee, and
any person related to the employee
within the third degree of consanguinity
or affinity.
Prohibition Against Executive
Chamber Employees
Lobbying State Agencies and Public
Authorities
The provisions of Public Officers
Law § 73(8) prohibiting former
State officers and employees from
appearing or practicing before their
former agency for a period of two
years shall, with respect to Executive
Chamber employees, extend to appearing
or practicing before any Executive
Branch agency or public authority.
Penalties
Any violation of this order may result
in dismissal or other appropriate
sanction as determined by the appointing
authority of the individual committing
such violation.
|